q

You are browsing the archive for Uncategorized.

Big Banks still don’t get it when it comes to working with SME’s

June 16, 2011 in Uncategorized

It didn’t surprise me one little bit when I read an article in the Australian Financial Review on 9 June 2011, titled ‘Big Banks deluded about small business’.  The article surmises that the vast majority of small business bankers are nothing more than product floggers trying to sell a product rather than providing consultation expertise to their SME clients, on their specific needs and working with them to get the best out of their business banking relationships.

Most disturbing is the bank’s illusion of their customers’ satisfaction with the service they’re receiving. The reality is of course entirely the opposite. Are the banks deluded about what they think they do for small business in Australia?

The answer is ‘Yes,’ if the research by Ian Freeman, of the business Non Executive Management, is anything to go by.  His research highlights the chasm between what banks think and the reality with their customers.

From a SME’s perspective desirable attributes of a business banker include:

  1. understanding and supporting my business when help is required
  2. being readily available
  3. Providing sound and constructive banking advice
  4. Interest in a long term relationship
  5. Understanding of key growth drivers of my business and ability and willingness to tailor products and services accordingly

The banks claim agreement with these attributes but their actual deliverables are very different.   For instance, banks thought 80 per cent of SMEs would agree with the first statement; ‘understanding and supporting my business when help is required’, when in reality the figure is less than 30 per cent.

These figures are backed by Ernst & Partners and research states that to engender loyalty the figure needs to be 90%+.

Worse still is that when SMEs were asked if the business bankers ‘Provide sounds constructive banking advice’ and ‘Understand the key growth drivers of the business and tailors products and services accordingly’ less than three per cent of SME’s agreed, yet the banks thought that 75% would agree.

Roy Morgan Research states the area of poorest performance across the banks is in understanding SMEs’ industry and poor knowledge of their business.

I’ve had experience working with business bankers and developing their consultative selling skills and sales capabilities. However, my work has been with corporates and with the upper end of SME business bankers, where investing in more professional business and sales practices is mainly supported, yet these same skills and capabilities are also needed at the small business end of the market where business are more vulnerable and in need of expert guidance and advice.

Many of the business bankers I have worked with are business savvy, experienced and able to work in a more consultative manner with their business clients.  For small business banking roles however, recruitment is mainly limited to young graduates with little business experience and often far less aware about how businesses are run.  Many are under-skilled or in a weaker position to offer real advice and experience about how to run and manage a business which makes me wonder why banks think they are doing the right thing by their small business clients.

Freeman’s research also finds that the small business banking sector is too ‘income’ focused while SME’s are ‘outcomes’ focused.  The banks think that because companies bought their products they were happy and loyal yet in reality many SMEs have nowhere else to go to have to buy their products and loyalty is not common place.  Simply because SMEs have no other choice than to buy their products from the banks does not necessarily mean they are happy with their service or loyal to the bank.

Worst of all, one of the banks performed a 10 week trial where their small business bankers were asked to genuinely model the ideal attributes listed above and find out what their clients really need rather than talk about product. Even though the result found the bank would boost sales by 94 per cent by working this way and customers were much happier with the approach, the bank in question abandoned the trial and went back to what they always did.

With 95 per cent of all businesses in Australia in the SME category, don’t we deserve better than this?  Banks would do well to rethink their strategy in serving the small business sector and transform their small business bankers from product floggers to consultative business practitioners. SMEs will thrive and grow from a consultative approach with bankers who know how to understand a client’s needs and business strategy, work with ambiguity and business complexity and facilitate access to the right business banking products and advice.  We would then see what a difference this could make to our business community and success.

Remember everybody lives by selling something.

Author: Sue Barrett, MD of www.barrett.com.au

Should you be a distributor or sell your own products?

May 12, 2011 in Uncategorized

‘Should I sell and distribute my own products or another company’s products?’  This is the question I really needed to answer back in 1995 and should have answered by 1999 however, it took me a further two years to understand what I really needed to do if I was to achieve my goals and fulfill my ambitions.

When I launched my consulting business in 1995 I had no actual product to speak of, other than myself.  I didn’t know much about the world of distributorships nor did I know how long it would take to build my own product portfolio.  In hindsight I had many lessons to learn. Lessons about being a product distributor, lessons about being a product manufacturer, and lessons about trying to do both at the same time.

Back to 1995 with no tangible product of my own to speak of but with the intention of building my own product range, I was approached by the SPQ*Gold assessment creators who asked me if I would like to become a distributor of their product.  As a new business it seemed an offer too good to refuse, especially as I had experience using their assessment before.  I knew that this product was a quality product and would give me a competitive edge. I also felt that it would give me the revenue boost I needed to get further more quickly and buy me some time to build my own product content.   So I signed the distributor license even though it favoured the product manufacturer more than it favoured me.

Because Barrett did such a great job distributing and selling SPQ*Gold we were approached by other assessment providers to sell their products too. So in and around 1998 I was faced with the opportunity of being specialist in assessments and becoming a distribution business.  It seemed attractive because money was coming in, and we knew a lot about assessments which our clients and sub-distributors valued. Yet something didn’t feel right for me. While everything seemed to be going well I revisited business goals i.e. the desire to build my own product and brand. I then looked at my distribution arrangements and agreements and realised I was trying to be both and it wasn’t working.  The demands of being a distributor had certain obligations while the demands of being a product developer had other requirements.  I then had another realization.  I could be both.   I also realised that in my haste to sign those distribution agreements I hadn’t protected my future earnings because at any time these product suppliers could come in and take over my distribution channels and I would be left with nothing.

What would I have to show for my efforts if I went the way of distribution or product development?  While harder in the short term and less profitable I chose the path of product development.

The challenge of productising knowledge

Like many consultants before me, my challenge has been to productise my knowledge, processes and experience, making them tangible, salable and able to be transferred and taught by others.  My experience in doing this has proved to be a very time consuming and difficult task, although well worthwhile.  Many consultants before me and many since have achieved this and captured their wisdom in the form of books. In 1995 there was no such thing as online learning, blogs, apps and other ways to capture content so I began building my own product content in the form of sales programs and sales management training programs which then expanded into things like Australia’s very first Sales & Service Competency dictionary (2006), Sales Recruitment Kits (2006), Sales Performance Management System (2007) and many more products since.  Now Barrett has an IP assets register with over 200 product items. However this has taken me 16 years to build and refine into salable and commercially functional products.

I still use other people’s assessments but not as a distributor.  I use them to supplement my work but not BE my work.  As it turns out in 2006 one of those assessment companies did what I predicted; they came in and took over mine and other licensed distributors territory.  It was a bitter pill to swallow. I’m glad I trusted my instincts and began building my own product portfolio because if I hadn’t, Barrett would not be the business it is today. I would have been left empty handed with nothing to show for my 11 years of hard work.  It may not be fair but in business things like this happen every day. So what lessons can we learn from this?

Some questions to consider and lessons learnt

  • Being a Distributor: If you’re selling and distributing other companies’ products make sure you check your licensing agreements and contracts. Also check the type of people you are dealing with and make sure you know what you are getting yourself into.   Some questions to consider about distribution licenses and arrangements:

o   Does the licensing arrangement allow the product owner to come in take over your licensing and sublicensing arrangements without warning?

o   Can they secure your client base off the back of your hard work with no compensation?

o   Are they set up so they can access your client data base?  If so, can they make direct contact with your clients to try to win them over?

o   Does the distribution license fairly balance your needs with their needs?

o   Can they guarantee supply and quality?

o   Are they open to new ideas and suggestions and are they willing to work with you in your market space?

o   Are they open, consistent and easy to deal with or difficult, inconsistent and secretive?

o   Is pricing clear and easy to work with or overly complicated or subject to change without notice?

o   Is the product supplier competing directly with you in the market place?

These are some of the questions I wish I knew to ask when I first went into distribution arrangements.

  • Building your own product: don’t underestimate the time it takes to build new product, especially in the knowledge space.

o   Create an IP assets register from the start and make sure you keep a log of all the products, ideas, and processes you develop.  I wish I had done this from the start as it’s much harder later on to recall everything and document it.  Truth be known I probably have 500+ items that could be on my IP assets register.

o   Create employment contracts that ensure you protect your IP.  I did do this from the start and this has been worthwhile.  They can’t protect you completely but set the expectation with employees from the start.

o   Be wary of constantly innovating – you have to get something to market and it will never be perfect.  Develop different versions as you upgrade just like they do with software.

o   Know how your product can be made to work across various applications i.e. online, physical product, publications, apps, etc.  You need to learn a lot about how products can be made in different formats especially in the consulting and learning space.

o   Know that it will take some time for your product to get traction and become a standard or benchmark. This is especially true if you’re up against international brands. They may not be as good as yours but have the cache or brand presence.

These are some of the lessons I have learned and I am sure there are experts who can advise you more than I can in this space.  However if you do want to make your own product from scratch you really need to believe in what you are doing and remember that it takes about 15 or more years to be an overnight sensation and excellence doesn’t happen by chance.

Remember everybody lives by selling something.

Author: Sue Barrett, MD of www.barrett.com.au

Whada ya rates?

September 23, 2009 in Attitudes & Behaviours, Complex Selling & Transactional Selling, Emotional Intelligence, Mindful selling, Negotiation, Sales Skills, Uncategorized

Whada ya rates? ‘Cos I’m a wholesaler and I can do better rates than them.  I can look at your thingos and give you a better deal…”

This is an excerpt from a call I received from a telecommunications wholesaler the other day.  As you can see this is not someone asking about my business rates but what I am paying for a particular service.  I am the supposed client in this exchange.  To make matters worse, when the caller introduced himself he said his name was John – that’s it, no where he was calling from or why he was calling.  This information only came to light after I asked him ‘who’ and ‘why’.

Furthermore, what is with “your thingos”?  After he blurted this out he did try to correct himself by replacing “thingos” with “bills” but the damage was already done.

On the same day as John, there was also the young woman from a well known travel agency who rang to offer me their services for corporate travel.  While pleasant enough (if not a bit too familiar for my liking) she had trouble listening to what I had said.  I had to repeat myself on numerous occasions which I found rather annoying and a waste of time.  I was later informed that her poor listening was due to a recent case of pneumonia – which she went on about for a few minutes.  This listening issue further escalated when she called back to our office three times to check the details I had given her.  As my staff took these calls on my behalf, here are some of the things that caused us to think less of this company:  She didn’t know who she had spoken to when she called back (even though I gave her my name initially); she assumed she was speaking to me when she was speaking to another member of my team; she didn’t take down my email address correctly and had to call back to get the correct one; and so on.

I am sure you can see me throwing up my hands in despair.

I do, however, give them credit for making the calls as this is usually the first and hardest step for people. To then go and ruin it all by poor telephone skills such as poor manners, poor diction, poor listening skills, and no clear purpose that the client/ prospect can understand. What a waste.

You may wonder why I bother taking these calls.  Well, it is research. And you never know, I might just find something I want or need from them as well (this does actually happen).

While I get a few very good calls every now and then (and yes I do let them know that they did a good job), sadly the vast majority of calls we get are below average or substandard.

Businesses must understand that this substandard approach to prospecting and telephone sales is ruining their business – both in terms of lost sales opportunities in the short-term and tarnished reputations in the long-term.

The good news is there are no secrets to making effective prospecting calls.  There are well document processes and tips some of which I have written about before in

Getting prospects to call you

How not to make a prospecting call

Please train your people in how to make proper, well intentioned business/sales phone calls – it’s not difficult.   A half day session in the ‘how to’ will get you started, followed by some pithy little sessions with your team on a regular basis to share what’s working well, etc.  I know I sound like June Dally-Watkins (famous deportment teacher) but as the saying goes ‘You never get a second chance to make a good first impression’.  Good manners, grace, and courtesy go a long way.

Training your people does work.  For instance, a large sales transformation training project we worked on earlier this year has seen their people having great success with their prospecting and sales conversion rates despite tough markets.  One of the key factors is that their people have been well trained in how to make purposeful, client focused, prospecting calls, and how to have effective client meetings.  Their conversion rate from call to appointment is at an all time high. And their client meeting up-selling and cross-selling rates have improved markedly as well.

The feedback from management is that they have noticed that a number of people who were initially afraid to prospect via phone are now much more confident, having been given the right skills training.  Others who were doing it instinctively but with no conscious framework have lifted as well.  This has helped them transform into professional business people who can prospect and sell well with dignity and grace.

It makes good business sense to train your people in the right way to conduct telephone prospecting and sales calls.

As we have seen from previous articles there is a chorus of people who think no one is allowed to prospect to anyone via the phone, however as I have written before prospecting by phone is a legitimate and effective way of opening and forging good business relationships.

If and until, the web can do all our prospecting for us (which seems unlikely for the foreseeable future) telephone prospecting is here to stay.  So, please for your own, your people, and your prospective clients sake please train them in how to prospect in a professional and purposeful manner.  If done properly, it can be a great source of revenue and a quick and efficient way to unearth new opportunities.

Happy prospecting.

‘Great’ at sales but they don’t ‘fit’ the culture

August 13, 2009 in Attitudes & Behaviours, Ethics & Values, Recruitment & Sales Recruitment, Sales Culture, Sales Excellence Acadamy, Uncategorized

Sound familiar? A ‘good’, maybe even ‘great’, salesperson is recruited and hits the ground running, kicking sales goals in the new role, however within a short space of time they have alienated their team, decided that the role is not for them, and left the organisation. As we know the cost of this selection is huge and begs the question, why did this ‘great’ salesperson not work out?
While there are many possible scenarios and reasons, we often find that a major contributor is the cultural ‘fit’ between the individual and the organisation. In recent times there has been a great deal written about organisational culture and while there is no one definition, many share in common themes such as collective experience, beliefs, goals, norms, values, traditions, systems and routines. It is commonly agreed that organisational culture is deeply rooted and often difficult for those inside to articulate and see with clarity. Cultural ‘fit’ is the compatibility between an individuals and organisations values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviours. It is often over looked when making recruitment decisions because organisations either do not know how to include it or do not see the importance of it.

Why cultural ‘fit’ is important?

Culture is everywhere in an organisation and is behind what happens… and what doesn’t happen in your organisation. Culture is strongly related to group values, and in turn group values are heavily influenced by what organisations and leaders prefer and encourage. As such, cultures have the power to attract people or expel them, and assessing values affords powerful insights.
Values are beliefs about what is important or desirable. Extensive research has shown compelling reasons for matching people with organisational culture and how it adds bottom-line value:

  • Firstly, it is important that employees’ values match those of the organisation in order to create a cohesive and supportive environment.
  • Secondly, a close value match between individuals and the organisation means the individual experiences significantly greater job satisfaction.
  • Thirdly, where the organisation’s values and those of the individual align, employees stay longer and are more likely to adjust to the environment.
  • Finally, the most productive organisations are those where employees stay and enjoy the job.

So, how do you measure cultural ‘fit’?

While there many methods to gain insight into cultural ‘fit’, an effective way is through Psychometric Assessments and consulting. There are Psychometric Assessments that specifically provide insight into motives and values and identify the following key areas:

  • Determine the existing culture and values system
  • Strengths and weaknesses within the organisation, including areas to leverage and ‘gaps’ the may hinder future success
  • Information about specific areas such as current potential for innovation and creativity- identifying individuals who naturally ‘have it’ and how to leverage this, as well as how to encourage those who do not
  • Information about the existing team to assist in recruiting new people into the business to ensure they ‘fit’

Think about your organisational culture and what is promoted, encouraged and rewarded out of the following areas:

  • Aesthetics – attention to style, appearance, quality, work surroundings, and ‘good taste’.
  • Affiliation – collaboration and social interaction.
  • Altruistic – concern for the welfare and well-being of others and their environment.
  • Commerce - business, money, and bottom-line focus.
  • Hedonism – fun, entertaining, and enjoyable workplace.
  • Power – success, accomplishment, status, competition, and control.
  • Recognition – public recognition, approval, and praise.
  • Scientific – data, knowledge, new and advanced technologies, and curiosity about how things work.
  • Security – certainty, predictability, order, and stability.
  • Tradition- dedication to the status quo and old-fashioned virtues.

Now let’s use these frameworks to reconsider the ‘great’ salesperson and imagine that we had Psychometrically Assessed the salesperson and the organisational culture prior to them starting. The Assessment revealed that the organisational culture promotes high levels of interaction and working closely with team members (affiliation), encourages concern for well-being (altruism) and rewards appearance and quality rather than substance (aesthetics).
The Assessment also revealed that our ‘great’ salesperson prefers a workplace that promotes a money driven, bottom-line approach (commerce), encourages competition between team members and status (power) and rewards factual, data driven performance (science).

Can you see any potential areas of conflict or mis-’fit’ between the individual and the organisation?

We hope that has given you a new way to articulate what it is promoted, encouraged and rewarded in your organisation, remembering that it will sometimes be intentional and other times intrinsically. While there are numerous methods, from our experience these Psychometric Assessments are the most efficient, effective and accurate method to gain a true understanding of the motives and values of the individual and the organisation. However, it is also important to remember that Psychometric Assessments are only one piece of the recruitment process and best results are achieved from a multi-pronged approach.
We hope that this will help avoid the common mistake many of us have made of hiring sales people on ‘skill’ and then firing them on ‘fit’.

Sue Barrett is Managing Director of BARRETT Pty Ltd. For more information please go to www.barrett.com.au.

Testing times when recruiting ‘good’ salespeople

August 6, 2009 in Recruitment & Sales Recruitment, Sales Assessments, Sales Research, Sales Talent, Uncategorized

When I consider how I spend my time professionally, I find it is often devoted to demystifying two things:

1. What is ‘good’ selling?
2. The proper use of psychometric assessments, especially in sales recruitment

Having written on the former on many occasions, I would like to dedicate this space to the latter – the proper use of psychometric assessments in sales recruitment.

To put this into perspective, my business has psychometrically assessed 40,000+ people in sales, business development and leadership roles using a variety of purpose built assessments.  This has provided us with valuable insight into what assessments work best in sales recruitment.  Over the years we have been exposed to many test publishers promoting their various assessments, claiming this and claiming that. We are constantly scanning for new tools.

We have discovered that there is no one single assessment that can measure everything you want to know about a sales person. Some test publishers have made this claim, however upon investigation we have found that they have often compiled several different assessments (measuring different things) into one offering. In doing so, they reduce the number of items measuring each area; therefore limiting the laser effect you need in sales recruitment.

This brings me to the major issue at hand: sales recruitment is one of the most challenging jobs around.  It is fraught with ambiguities because of the very nature of trying to assess ‘soft skills’ such as attitudes and actual versus perceived capability. Given this complexity, as a sales recruiter it may be beneficial to partner with a qualified and experienced organisation to support you when using assessments.

There is not one-quick-fix to getting this right. To assist you in your sales recruitment, let’s look at three important questions when it comes to using psychometric assessments:

1. Why use assessments?
2. What assessments should you use?
3. When should you use assessments?

Why use assessments?

While you don’t have to use assessments when recruiting, when used in conjunction with a robust sales recruitment process they can add real value to your decision making. The problem arises when assessments are used in place of a multi-pronged recruitment approach.

Recruitment, especially sales recruitment, can be very time consuming, therefore there is a tendency for people to take short cuts and replace the other steps in the recruitment process with a ‘quick’ psychometric assessment to base their hiring decision on.

This ‘assessment only’ approach is not how psychometric assessments are designed to be applied (reputable test publishers will always tell you this). This approach is not best practice; it does not give you all the answers and could get you into trouble with recruitment and anti- discriminatory laws. In fact, best practice states that assessments should account for no more than 20% of your decision making process in recruitment, especially sales.

The other main issue that arises out of this ‘assessment only’ approach is that the ‘assessment’ can get blamed if the sales person doesn’t work out.  Assessing in isolation is the issue here, not the assessment itself.

Psychometric assessments are best used to back up and cross reference the current data you have gathered via other means.   Depending upon which assessments you use, they can corroborate what you have already gathered and give you additional information to further investigate areas of concerns.

Tip: Psychometric assessments should compliment a multi-pronged sales recruitment process rather than be the recruitment process in entirety.

What assessments should you use?

I have seen anything from the CLEO quiz, numerology, star signs, and simplistic 4 quadrant models through to purpose built psychometric assessments used in sales recruitment.

Essentially there are thousands of so called ‘psychometric assessments’ out there, many claiming to test for sales effectiveness and predict sales performance.

So what to use?

First of all, it depends on what you want to measure.  There are a variety of purpose built assessments which are designed to address the following important questions about a candidate:

•  Will they sell?
•  Why will they sell?
•  How do they sell?
•  How well can they sell?

In our work we use a range assessments which have been purpose built to measure different areas including:

•  Personality
•  Motives and Values
•  Prospecting fitness- sales hesitation and call reluctance
•  Leadership potential
•  Cognitive Abilities – i.e. abstract, numeracy, and verbal reasoning, etc.
•  Coping strategies under pressure
•  Emotional Resilience and Emotional Intelligence (EI)

Tip: Depending on the level and complexity of the sales roles you should match the psychometric assessments to the required competencies and areas of capability.

When should you use assessments?

As assessments should not be used as the sole determinant, it is often advised to use them after the first interview but prior to the second interview and reference checking. This is recommended so that the assessment results can be used to verify and check gathered candidate information and then incorporating the results into interview questions and reference checks.

While there are some assessments you can use prior to the first interview or even at the resume submission point, the decision to assess earlier is often based on costs to the business. Obviously, it would be great to test everyone who applies, however this would not be economically viable or recommended in most recruitment situations.

Tip: Use the insight gained through assessments for the second interview questions and reference checks.

Conclusion

Whether you currently use assessments or are considering (recommended) incorporating them, the important point is:

Providing structure and using a multi- pronged approach are the two techniques most likely to help improve the reliability of your sales recruitment process and placements.

Remembering that sales recruitment is one of the most challenging jobs around; the average increase in output resulting from improved selection is approximately 2.5 times greater in sales jobs than in low-complexity, non-sales jobs. This is why is can also be important to partner with an organisation who has a sound understanding and working knowledge of recruitment and assessments.

I wish you happy and successful selling and sales recruitment.

Sue Barrett is Managing Director of BARRETT Pty Ltd. For more information please go to www.barrett.com.au.

You can send feedback via this form.

Switch to our mobile site